2nd kyu
|
Min wool is NOT THE SAME as fiberglass! But, they function the same (more or less) to control acoustics. The biggest difference is that min wool is messy. It turns to powder as you handle it and cut it. So if you don't mind that difficulty then you can save a lot of money using it instead of fiberglass. I did a lot of treatment in my room and I used min wool to save money. It worked.
|
| |
|
Godan

|
quote: Min wool is NOT THE SAME as fiberglass! But, they function the same (more or less) to control acoustics.
The most of MW I see around here functions better than 703. I've got a lot of Thermafiber branded SAFB recently, it is just between 703 & 705 - works perfect for me & a lot cheaper. Like I've already mentioned - the key is density.
|
| |
| Posts: 2157 | Location: Chicago, IL | Registered:: 03-30-06 |    |
|
2nd kyu
|
It works basically the same as an acoustical absorber, according to the numbers. But it is a totally different type of product (spun rock fiber instead of spun glass fiber) As I mentioned, I used it to treat my entire studio. I was attempting to point out that they aren't 'the same'. I believe you meant to say they *function* the same, but if you go to an insulation provider and say "I'll take the rockwool since it's the same thing as OC705" you'll get a wierd look and maybe a chuckle. And, for that matter, it is considerably harder to work with than 703. Fiberglass doesn't crumble and disintegrate nearly as easily as the rockwool does. That didn't matter to me, but some people don't want the hassle.
|
| |
|
Shodan

|
quote: The rep said he thought it was better in walls than on walls but didn't elaborate much--
That's what the guy I talked to yesterday implied as well. He was saying their "special formulation" was sonically better than Owens Corning, but he was speaking in regards to it being in the wall as opposed to on the wall. However, he didn't object when I mentioned covering it for panels.
|
| |
| Posts: 347 | Location: Lancaster, CA | Registered:: 07-29-07 |    |
|
2nd kyu
|
If it's going *inside* a frame you won't have too much trouble handling it. Just handle it *reasonably* carefully so it doesn't crumble when you cut it. It isn't going to fall apart with normal handling. Check out my website for photos of my room project. You can see some of what I did to make panels with the rockwool. http://www.junglenoisestudio.com/photos/Enjoy!
|
| |
|
6th kyu
|
If working with mineral wool (building panels) I would recommend 8 pound as it is stiffer and will do a better job on the low end. If building something that will fill the whole corner, sometimes known as a super chunk, then use the 4 pound. We work with all of them 4/8 pound wool and 703 and find them all a bitch to work with.  Glenn
|
| |
|
Kyudan

|
I will use Rockwool here. There IS a difference...it's greener. . . . . For further proof of my lack of expertise, please listen to: My Tunes
|
| |
| Posts: 6502 | Location: Twangville, TN | Registered:: 01-06-03 |    |
|
Hoser Godan

|
quote: Originally posted by josan: A hell just build a rammed earth studio and you will have the best acoustic properties as well as healthy studio going......well one can dream.
Thats what Randy Bachman did 
|
| |
| Posts: 2003 | Location: North Vancouver, Canada | Registered:: 03-01-04 |    |
|
6th kyu
|
Can you but it online?
|
| |
|
Nidan
|
quote: all this wool talk is making me itchy
Yeah that's why I try to design everything so I don't have to cut it. Lance
|
| |
| Posts: 430 | Location: Sooner Nation,OK | Registered:: 06-14-07 |    |
|